|
Third review - scroll down for earlier |
Quite a wild cold throw aroma on the stick. A clash of natural and synthetic, and very woodsy with rough agarwood and sandalwood - both synthetic, melding with benzoin, which presents as natural. Sharp volatile notes. The whole is interesting, and is attractive in parts, but is a little aggressive and ugly.
The scent on the burn is more balanced, attractive, gentle, and sensual than that on the stick. Quite woodsy, though with a tad of smoke, and a sense of synthetic, despite the "Natural Incense" subtitle on the box. I like the musky, patchouli, woodsy combination, though feel it's not really going anywhere so this remains in the woodsy area, and it's a little grungy in that area if you stay too long. Some light and contrast is needed. I like this, but not quite as much as last time, nor quite as much as I expected to. I have been burning a lot of
Pushkar incense over the last few days, and perhaps that's put me in the wrong mood to enjoy incense made with too strong a dose of synthetics and agarbathi oil. I do still like this, and I like it waaaay more than the Pushkar, but it's not lifting me as much as it did last year.
Date: Jan 2025 Score: 39
|
Second review |
A fresh pack of Woods picked up for £1 from my local corner shop. The box says: "Includes natural oils and resins cherished from time immemorial for their aromachological properties".
Aromachology is a modern science, so - with the phrase "from time immemorial" - I assume the company mean
aromatherapy. Aromatherapy is the use of scents to influence human behaviour, while aromachology is the scientific study of that influence.
Volatile aroma on the stick. A little medicinal - suggestions of band-aid - which is sometimes compared to
oud, especially synthetic oud such as
Firmenich, along with herbs, spice, wood, glue, and
Lady Esquire shoe conditioner, which contained
Tetrachloroethylene. Notes of carbolic soap - or perhaps more accurately,
Coal Tar Soap. It's cleansing, uplifting, slightly euphoric - almost narcotic, and quite compelling.
I have a new upright incense burner, which I bought off
Amazon for £17. It's decent quality, quite sturdy, looks lovely, burns well, has three different size holder holes, and (which I was looking for) has space to collect the ash. Sadly, while the top screws on securely to the tower, the base does not screw onto the tower, so moving it is precarious, and the tower - complete with burning joss stick - can be knocked over rather too easily. After experimenting with upright, upside down, and the classic 30 degree angle, I found I was happier with the angled burn.
I like the scent on the burn - it's warm, neutral, slightly chalky, has elements of
benzoin, which presents as natural. There are elements of the synthetic oud noted on the stick, so my assumption is that this stick contains a combination of synthetic oud and natural benzoin (which, like oud or agarwood, is also a tree resin, though less expensive). There are attractive fruit and spice notes, a little reminiscent of mulled wine, tangs of spicy orange and cinnamon. I do like this. I like it a lot.
Date: July 2024 Score: 41
|
First review |
I have been burning
Ranga Rao incense since
at least April 2013, and have found them to be a solid maker across the range from budget to premium. They have a number of brands, though Cycle is the best known and most respected, and is the one that tends to get my higher scores. Cycle is mostly, though not exclusively,
masala style. I can't remember why, but I've been wanting to try this Cycle Brand Woods for some time, so was pleased to see it at
aavyaa for £1.50.
The sticks are 9 inches long with 7 1/2 inches of soft, crumbly black paste
hand-rolled onto a plain
machine-cut bamboo splint, and finished with a thin smear of brown wood powder. There is a medicinal volatile scent on the stick. Some wood, though the largest impression is of cool menthol (which I seem to be getting a lot of recently, perhaps my mind is tuned into that). On the whole the initial impression is not encouraging. The sticks don't look attractive, and the scent, though reasonably wholesome at a distance, is not that welcoming when getting up close. The packaging is acceptable, but more sort of meh rather than wow. I do like, though, that the inner foil pack has a
ziploc reseal to ensure the sticks remain fresh. I think that's the first time I've encountered that on commercial incense bags.
On lighting up, the stick burns hungrily, giving off black smoke until blown out, then it settles into producing a solid column of grey smoke. The scent is divine. Warm, woodsy, mildly sweet, mineral notes, some gentle spice, hovering around an almond benzoin scent. My first burn of this was quite heavenly, and I got quite enthusiastic. Later burns have not invoked the same response. While still being very positive, I'm not being transported. The incense is elegant, soft, welcoming, woodsy, mineral, reassuring. It gently informs the room with a pleasing, attractive, warm and woody aroma. The stick burns for approx 65 minutes.
Date: Sept 2023 Score: 36
***